The 2013 documentation indicates that a 3 server pool is recommended for Ha, that its best for the undergoing fabric technology. What I don't get is the table in the documentation tells me that in a 2 server pool I can lose one server and maintain functionality,
oddly enough it says the same thing for a three server pool. With that said, in a small deployment that wants HA why would I do 3 servers? It almost seems like more of an administrative pain only being able to take down one of the 3 servers at a time making
a simple monthly patching operation a minimum of 3 operations. Ref: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412996.aspx
↧